Tuesday, 15 April 2014

Choice is Ours

Come elections and for our netas it is time for desertions, new alliances, name calling, allegations, counter-allegations, back-stabbing, party hopping and making lofty promises they have no intention to honour. 

It is also the time to give a go by to the real issues that the country needs to sort out and whip up frenzies to mislead the common man.

Samajwadi Party supremo Mulayam Singh Yadav’s “boys will be boys, can’t hang rapists” comment at an election rally in Moradabad a couple of days ago is proof of the sick mind-set many of our politicians have and the abysmal depths they can stoop down to when it comes to garnering votes.

Not only did he make the highly objectionable remark and express his displeasure and disagreement with the death sentence awarded by court to three of the accused found guilty in the Mumbai’s infamous Shakti mill case, but also promised to amend the country’s anti rape laws to make them more lenient, if his party was voted to power in the on-going general elections.

Yadav’s statement has expectedly drawn widespread condemnation. He was clearly attempting to lure criminals into his party fold, already drawing flak for incompetent governance and poor law and order situation during its current two year rule in Uttar Pradesh. People must give his party the treatment it deserves when they go to their polling booth.

As BJP’s prospects brighten up and Congress appears set to make an inglorious exit after UPA’s second tenure known more for financial scams than for governance; India’s perpetual woes like corruption, unemployment, unsustainable population, high fiscal deficit, development, lack of infrastructure, poor law and order situation, poverty, illegal Bangladeshi immigrants etc., which everybody talks about all the time but nobody has any answers to; have suddenly been abandoned by all non NDA parties, threat to “secularism” being the new one point agenda and Narendra Modi the singular target.

At election rallies, BSP’s Mayawati has been telling people that there will be widespread riots across the country if Modi comes to power. Rahul Gandhi (Congress) has been accusing Modi of attempting to promote communalism while Nitish Kumar (JDU), Laloo Prasad (RJD), Mamta Banerji (TMC), Farooq Abdullah (NC), Ajit Singh (RLD) and leaders of other UPA parties are calling him anti-Muslim.

Nitish and Mamta were also seen sharing dais with persons wanted by police for criminal offences at their election rallies. Congress candidate from Saharanpur in UP Imran Masood threatened to cut Modi to pieces during his campaign. Even Arvind Kejriwal (AAP), it seems, has abandoned his anti-corruption and clean politics stance and is reportedly in the process of striking a deal with don Mukhtar Ansari to get Muslim votes for himself in Varanasi.

Despite the fact that Supreme Court has given him the clean chit, Modi’s political opponents are telling people that he alone is responsible for the 2002 Gujarat communal riots. This, in fact, appears to be the only point that the so called “secular” parties seem to drive home as they keep repeating it over and over again at their election rallies and meetings in their bid to exhort Muslims to cast their vote en-bloc against the BJP.

No mention, though,  is made of the worst communal riots in our history in 1947 on either side of partition, 1984 anti-Sikh, 1969 Ahmedabad, 1983 Assam, 1964 Rourkela & Jamshedpur, 1980 Moradabad, 1989 Bhagalpur, 1993 Mumbai and countless other riots under Congress rule; Muzaffarnagar 2013 and at least two dozen more elsewhere in UP during the last two years of Samajwadi Party rule; or the brutal killing and rape of Kashmiri Pandits and their subsequent “ethnic cleansing” from their homeland forced by Islamic fundamentalists in 1989 under National Front rule. Incidentally, 1984 riots were also disgracefully justified with “big tree falls” remark by the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.

No reference is also made of the fact that post 2012, no communal disturbances have occurred in Gujarat or how the state has developed under Modi’s rule. Moreover, BJP ruled states are relatively more peaceful and better administered than those governed by other parties.

Also omitted is the fact that the six year NDA rule from 1998 to 2004 under Atal Bihari Vajpayee was a rare period of internal peace, economic growth and consolidation, unprecedented infrastructural planning and execution – be it National Highways, Delhi Metro or new airports; during which the country also successfully conducted peaceful nuclear test and won the proxy war in Kargil forced upon us by Pakistan.

It is up to us thus, the common citizens of this country, to ponder before we cast our votes.

We have to understand that the self-appointed guardians of “secularism” show their concern only for Muslims to ensure that they remain their captive vote bank to be cashed at the polling booth, other minorities totally ignored as they cannot be used thus.

We also have to understand that most political parties have no inner party democracy and are run like family owned shops. Brothers, sisters, wives, daughters, sons and relatives are fielded as candidates; kith and kin mint money by way of contracts, bribes and kickbacks if they get to participate in the government; while the cheated voter awaits fulfilment of promises made to him in vain. We have allowed our netas to fool us for far too long.

We must likewise remember that the Constitution of India, which guarantees justice, liberty and equality to all of us irrespective of our caste, creed, sex or religion, is to be strictly adhered to by the person who takes oath as the country’s Prime Minister. He does not act alone but collectively as per the decisions of the Cabinet. Additionally, he is answerable to the Legislature and Judiciary, besides being under constant media scrutiny.

Amid such situation, who do we give our mandate to? To those playing the caste and communal cards, to those in league with criminals, those promising freebies and more quotas, the corrupt, deceivers, self-seekers, medieval, or the ones with a proven track record and who can be trusted for deliverance?

The choice is ours.

(Published in Garhwal Post on 15/04/2014)



Tuesday, 8 April 2014

Over 200 seats for BJP means support for Modi: Vinod Mehta

A congregation of social activists, school children, scribes and eminent citizens of Doon had a rare stimulating intellectual interaction on Sunday with celebrated editor Vinod Mehta as he delivered a candid talk on his understanding of the current political scene in the country.

Hosted by Garhwal Post at St. Joseph’s Academy, the tête-à-tête was informal, simple and to the point - no ifs and buts.

Though an ardent supporter of Congress, Mehta feels that the winds of political change have been blowing in the country for many months now and the people of India made up their minds long ago to vote Congress party out of power in the 2014 general elections. People are angry with the incumbent government and the extent of the people’s wrath will be reflected in the final tally of seats.

As he has been saying for the past few months now, Mehta feels that BJP’s Narendra Modi is set to assume office as the country’s Prime Minister next month. If the BJP gets less than 200 seats, it will mean that the vote is for the party while anything over that would mean that people have voted for Modi. He, however, has doubts on Modi’s ability to carry with him all the religious minorities of the country. Mehta also disclosed that he has two ongoing cases in courts against Modi.

BJP, he said, was flush with funds as was evident in its aggressive advertisement blitz. Congress, on the other hand, seemed to be heading for its worst ever performance, with a strong possibility of failing to reach even the three figure mark. There also seemed to be voices within the Congress to give a larger role to Priyanka as Rahul appeared to be not only a reluctant leader but also not fit for the grind of Indian politics.

Mehta was also critical of the hate campaign speech by Congress candidate from Saharanpur in UP Imran Masood wherein he said that he would cut Narendra Modi to pieces if he attempted to turn UP into Gujarat. He also blamed the media, particularly television, for showing the objectionable clip repeatedly thereby making the situation graver.

The interactive session that followed was lively too.

Renu D. Singh, eminent lawyer and social worker, asked whether women-specific issues and participation of women in politics will get a boost should Narendra Modi become the Prime Minister, Mehta said though he did not foresee anything dramatic happening, yet things could change for the better if a dynamic person like Sushma Swaraj heads the ministry for Women and Child Development.

Several school children wanted to know what he thought of Arvind Kejriwal and his ill-fated government in Delhi, to which he said Kejriwal was a good protester but did not have a clue to governance and hence could not run his government. Mehta answered several other queries from the audience amid cheering and applause.

All in all it was an absorbing and fruitful session.

Eminent citizen Dr. S. Farooq welcomed Vinod Mehta with a bouquet of flowers.

Satish Sharma was the master of ceremonies.



(Published in Garhwal Post on 07/04/2014)


Tuesday, 11 March 2014

Time for a Women's Party?

We are strange people. We worship goddesses like Laxmi, Durga, Kali and numerous others with great fervour in homes and temples across the country. Some people can also be seen touching the feet of contemporary powerful women like Sonia Gandhi, J. Jailalitha, Mamta Banerjee, Mayawati, etc. But in real life, many of us subject our women to all possible kinds of atrocities and deny them even their most basic rights.
In line with our hypocrisy vis-à-vis women who constitute half of our populace, the MPs we sent to New Delhi five years ago ensured that the Women’s Reservation Bill proposing to reserve 33% of seats for women at all levels of legislature lapsed with the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha. Similar bills had been introduced thrice earlier in 1990s and had met the same fate.

In spite of the fact that we had the world’s second woman prime minister way back in 1966, the number of women in parliament and state assemblies has been abysmally low. The percentage of women MPs has varied from less than four in the 6th Lok Sabha to eleven in the 15th. Closer home, only 5 women (7%) got elected to the Uttarakhand Assembly in 2007 as well as 2012, while the state has sent one woman MP apiece to Rajya and  Lok Sabha so far.

To ensure the right of women to participate in politics, the Women’s Reservation Bill, drafted in 1996, was introduced by the UPA government in May 2008 in Rajya Sabha during its first tenure. It was duly passed by Rajya Sabha on 10th March 2010. Our representatives kept the bill pending in Lok Sabha for four years on some pretext or the other, even as numerous others were passed with little or no discussion.

Those opposed to the bill were supporters of the government like Samajwadi Party, Rashtriya Janata Dal, Bahujan Samaj Party and Trinamool Congress; whereas Janata Dal United and Shiv Sena were from the NDA camp. BSP’s Mayawati claimed that the bill was an example of anti-dalit mentality of the Congress and other political parties, while SP’s Mulayam Singh Yadav was not in its favour as he feared his own political career could come to a premature end if his constituency got reserved for women! Yadav also made certain unsavoury statements in reference to the bill.
It is worthwhile to note that this bill had widespread backing of various women’s organizations across the country; and the ruling Congress, the opposition BJP and many other parties in the parliament. AIADMK chief J. Jayalalitha, DMK’s M. Karunanidhi and BJD’s Naveen Patnaik welcomed the bill and appealed that it be adopted without delay time and again.  It also had full support of CPM, CPI, NCP, Telugu Desam Party, Akali Dal and AGP.

Notwithstanding a joint appeal to Lok Sabha MPs to pass the bill in its last session by women leaders Sushma Swaraj (BJP), Sheila Dixit (Congress) and Brinda Karat (CPI-M) from a shared platform in December 2013 and in spite of the fact that parties supporting it had more than the required strength to carry it through, it was not passed;  even as the government worked overtime to successfully push the bill for bifurcation of the state of Andhra Pradesh through both the houses of parliament in record three days.

Interestingly, had this bill been passed and had the government lost its majority in the house as a consequence following withdrawal of support by some of its allies, it would not have mattered at all at this stage. Sonia Gandhi’s “regret” at the bill not being passed by Lok Sabha for lack of consensus thus appears hollow.  

Whether our leaders genuinely want the presence of more women in legislature, or their intent is merely to exploit the issue for garnering votes, will be known to us over the next few weeks. The onus now is on political parties currently in business to ensure that women comprise a respectable percentage of the candidates they field in the forthcoming general elections on their tickets.


Should they fail to do so, it would perhaps be time for the women of this country and their well-wishers to dump them altogether and form a new party dominated by women.


(Published in Garhwal Post on 11/03/2014)




Saturday, 22 February 2014

Notional Highway 58

Dear Satish Sharma ji,

This has reference to your “Open invitation to the CM” (GP dated 18/02/2014).

Let me first bring to your notice that you took an inordinately long time in congratulating Shri Harish Rawat ji, our new Chief Minister. You could easily have done so on 1st February itself at parade ground where hordes of people from across the length and breadth of our state had assembled for this specific purpose.

You were, perhaps, unaware.  Maybe caught in a traffic jam. Or did you have some sort of an understanding with the BJP that you greeted the CM on the day the opposition party tabled the no confidence motion against his government in Vidhan Sabha? Please come clean on the matter.

State of the road from Doon to Delhi? Well it is UK-UP-UK-UP-Delhi if you take the Mohand route and UK-UP-Delhi if you want to go via Haridwar. Even a X standard child knows that. You urgently need to upgrade your knowledge of local geography.

That you feel the road is in an appalling condition is quite surprising. It is possible that you are ignorant of the fact that each of the thousands of potholes have been carefully designed, carved and put in place purposefully by none other but the Rain God himself. The sole objective being to bring people approaching Doon face to face with the almighty every few metres so that even the most stubborn atheist enters Uttarakhand as a spiritual person! Our state, after all, is Dev Bhoomi.

The road in question ensures that the first lap of adventure tourism begins at Uttarakhand Martyrs memorial at Rampur Tiraha itself; Mussoorie and Rishikesh being the stopovers for the second. NHAI should, in fact, seriously consider setting up a few “Fool Plazas” to make users of this notional (or is it national?) highway to pay tax for the thrills that they are presently getting for free. Moreover, this road has also been providing more and more self-employment opportunities to local folks who have set up puncture repair and motor workshops en route; as well as supporting our auto ancillary industry amid the current economic downturn.

This being the situation, your demand for repairs is unreasonable on two counts. One, it would amount to interference in divine work which you yourself oppose when, for example, trees are cut for road widening; and two, you seem to have no knowledge of how the government works. Unlike your newspaper that you bring out a new edition of everyday, government work is serious and thus takes time.

Orders are issued at the top, transmitted down the entire political and then the bureaucratic hierarchy to the concerned babu in the secretariat, before the first alphabet on the first page of the file is written. The file then goes up and comes down similarly with notings, sightings and initials several times before it is complete and ready to be acted upon, assuming that clearance from the high command in New Delhi has been obtained somewhere in between.

Concern for road repair will duly be announced just before the enforcement of the model code of conduct for parliamentary elections, while the file will be completed and contracts awarded a month or two before the 2017 assembly polls, thereby gaining brownie points twice instead of just once if your suggestion is considered.

And now the real reason for writing this letter to you. You have either forgotten to or deliberately not mentioned the type of vehicle you are going to use on your intended ride to Muzaffarnagar with the CM.  Is it a bicycle, scooter, motorbike, auto-rickshaw, vikram, car, jeep, SUV, tractor, bus, truck, jugaad or one that I may be ignorant of? Is it bullet proof?

As per my information, for security reasons, Chief Minister is permitted to use only a bullet proof car along with his fleet consisting of many other vehicles when travelling by road, primarily for commuting locally in Doon; taking the aerial route for inter-city and long distance journeys. So choose an appropriate automobile prudently.

And while doing so, don’t forget that Shri Satpal Maharaj ji  carried out survey for Doon Saharanpur railway line in 1997 by helicopter!

With best regards,

Rajive Singh.


(Published in Garhwal Post on 21/02/2014 as Upgrade knowledge of Geography!)


Sunday, 26 January 2014

Missed the Plot

The constitution of India came into effect on 26 January 1950, giving power to its citizens to rule themselves, i.e., being administered by a government of, by and for the people. More importantly, it endeavored to secure to all its inhabitants justice, liberty and equality; as well as promoting fraternity, individual dignity and unity and integrity of the nation. The world’s largest Democratic Republic was thus born, full of hope and promise.

Sixty four years on, many of the goals we set for ourselves continue to elude us.

Based on the situation prevailing then, our constitution provided reservation on the basis of caste in parliament, legislatures, educational institutions and government jobs for a period of 20 years, hoping that disadvantaged sections would attain parity with others within the stipulated time. Whereas this in itself was controversial as not all upper caste people were rich, educated and well off, and vice versa; what instead happened was the cornering of most such benefits by the affluent of such castes in the initial years and by their progenies thereafter. Few of the actual intended beneficiaries could actually use it to their advantage.

Such quota system not only continues till date, but more and more castes have been included, while many others are clamoring to get in, even as the percentage of reservation itself has gone up significantly, amid shrinking opportunities. Worse, our political parties have been trying to bring private sector under the reservation net too.

            For the quota system to really have a positive effect on the lives of the have-nots, it should be a one-time concession made available to an individual - and not for all his descendants for all times to come - poverty being the only basis. Moreover, its quantum must come down to reasonable levels.

Secularism is one feature that can unite people of different faiths like no other. For us, however, it means selective minority ism, i.e., a particular religious minority is wooed and pampered for political gain, other minorities and the majority being given a go by. Anyone talking about the interest of the majority community is branded a fundamentalist. Following a communal disturbance, a large number of our secularists shed bountiful tears for one group but fail to do the same for sufferers belonging to the other.

In 1989 when militants subjected Kashmiri Pandits to numerous indignities and brutalities such as murder, rape of women, torture, forcible seizure of property, etc., forcing them to flee their homeland, our elected governments in New Delhi and Srinagar watched helplessly and spinelessly, failing to take tough action. Even as the Pandits complete 25 years as refugees in camps in their own country, our secularists have failed to take notice of their plight, their return to and rehabilitation in Kashmir seemingly not even being on anybody’s agenda.
Rather than promoting fraternity, reservation and secularism have become tools in the hands of our politicians to compartmentalize us for exploitation as vote banks.
Law and order has deteriorated across the country as a result of political interference in police work and its increasing use in providing security to VIPs. Politicians have also been patronizing big time criminals increasingly, many of them being lawbreakers themselves.
Ghastly crimes are on the rise; particularly against children, women and senior citizens; with no respite in sight. Meaningful action is taken only if people come out on the streets to protest or political scores are to be settled.
Bribery, larceny and lethargy reign supreme in government offices. Contracts are awarded not on merit but on the amount of kickbacks received. Public funds are frequently embezzled in the corridors of power. Security of the country is compromised for easy money.
Justice remains an illusion for most. Our courts take years for delivering verdicts, resulting in even well-intentioned witnesses frequently turning hostile. Conviction rates are abysmally low as police commonly botch up investigation.While our brave defence personnel have been making supreme sacrifices for us in increasing numbers, our governments have been shying away from taking tough decisions. Pakistan not only controls part of Kashmir and repeatedly violates the LOC, but also sends in terrorists regularly. Chinese forces have been intruding into our territory more and more frequently. Bangladesh has been exporting illegal immigrants to us in ever increasing numbers. We have been repeatedly failing to protect our national interest. What went wrong? Where did we lose the plot? Nobody seems to have any answer.
Amid the great hope of 1950 turning to despair, we celebrate our 65th Republic Day. A great official - of, by and for the government -  spectacle in New Delhi, exhibiting our military might, heritage, culture, and unity; for Chief Guest Shinzo Abe, Prime Minister of Japan, our elected rulers and the world to witness.
All is not lost, though. For the ordinary citizen of this country is increasingly refusing to play the mute spectator.

(Published in Garhwal Post on 25th January 2014)






Saturday, 4 January 2014

How far can AAP go?

The euphoria amongst the residents of Delhi in general and the supporters of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in particular after AAP’s success in the December 2013 Assembly polls is quite like the one witnessed in March 1977 across the country in the wake of the defeat of the Congress at the hands of the Janata Party in the general elections and the installation of the first ever non-Congress Union government. Shiela Dixit herself got humiliated in her own constituency, as had Indira Gandhi in Rae Barielly then. Elsewhere, Congress lost out to the BJP in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chattisgarh, while it retained power in Mizoram.

Post the debacle, a sudden flurry of activity from the Congress has been witnessed. The Lokpal Bill was hurriedly gotten passed by both the houses of parliament in record two days and has already received presidential assent. Maharashtra government, that had rejected the Judicial Commission report on Adarsh scam on 20th December, is likely to reverse its decision soon. In the wake of the recent Supreme Court judgement upholding I.P.C. section 377 as valid a review petition has been hurriedly filed by the government, though nothing had been done for the last 13 years after Law Commission recommended that it be scrapped. Augusta Westland helicopter deal has been scrapped. Some twenty five years after Rajiv Gandhi famously admitted that barely 10% of the funds meant for the poor actually reached them – 90% being swindled en route, his son Rahul has suddenly realised that people are in a “mood” to fight corruption!

Anti-corruption crusader turned politician Arvind Kejriwal donning the mantle of the first non-Congress non-BJP Chief Minister of Delhi, albeit of a minority government, has to walk the tightrope in his bid to keep his populist poll promises on electricity and water; provide transparent and corruption free governance; as also to keep the Congress party in good humour to ensure its continued support. He has started off well by doing away with unnecessary heavy security in the Secretariat as also beacons on ministers and bureaucrats cars. After all, public servants who are not easily accessible to and have to be shielded from the ordinary citizens they are supposed to serve are not only useless but also a huge drain on scarce public funds.

All right thinking and forward looking citizens of India are fed up of the raging all round corruption that has taken firm roots in our country to an extent that, if not dealt with and uprooted urgently, will soon put a question mark on our very existence as a nation. Tales of how politicians, bureaucrats and power brokers are routinely looting us are uncovered regularly as newer scams get exposed. Police is busy guarding the “servants” of the public while the “masters” must fend for themselves. Kejriwal himself stood up for such issues and much of his electoral success can be attributed to this. As such, his working, particularly in the area of tackling graft, will be under constant public scrutiny.

Our political parties compete with each other in making unreasonable promises while wooing voters, subsidy being the magic word. LPG, kerosene and diesel are sold at less than what they cost in the name of “taming” inflation, rendering blue chip oil companies sick on one hand and preventing private players from competing on the other. Safety and services on Indian Railways, the third largest globally, take a back seat as passenger fares are not hiked for a decade since the incumbent ministers want to add to their political clout. Our leaders, perhaps, want us to become a nation of freeloaders wanting all without paying for anything.

In line with this tradition and as promised, the AAP government has already announced 700 litres of free water per household per day and slashed the electricity tariff by half for three months. More sops may be in the pipeline. How, why and for how long can goods and services can thus be provided is anybody’s guess. Ultimately some other vital plans have to be put on hold or abandoned altogether to support such subsidies. It would have been much better had AAP promised uninterrupted supplies at normal rates.

Congress has a notorious history of opportunistically propping up and ditching other dispensations at its whims. In 1979, it promised outside support to an ambitious Charan Singh who split the Janata Party to form a minority government, only to ditch him on the floor of the Lok Sabha. It meted out similar treatment to Chandra Shekhar in1990, H.D. Deve Gowda in 1997 and I.K. Gujral in 1998, thus forcing three early general elections on the country. Against this backdrop, it would be foolhardy to think that the present AAP government can last very long. As such Kejriwal has to work swiftly and hard to showcase his administrative skills. 

By lending support to AAP, Congress seems to have struck a political masterstroke. It has not only denied an upbeat BJP a 4-0 victory in the Hindi belt, but also ensured that Kejriwal and his team are kept busy in Delhi ahead of the parliamentary polls six months away, thereby minimising the influence of AAP elsewhere in the country. These twin objectives achieved, it is expected that Congress will lose little time in dumping Kejriwal soon after the general elections, irrespective of their outcome.


(Published in Garhwal Post on 3rd January 2014)





Tuesday, 20 August 2013

Exemplary Netas

Our netas are truly great. They lead by example, their leadership skills being constantly on public display, which common people ought to emulate. Take our fundamental duties, for instance. The first duty, among ten others, that every citizen of India is obliged to fulfil is to “abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem”.

Our neta’s allegiance to our constitution is complete. Whenever there is any difficulty in following our constitution, it is suitably amended so that it can truly be followed in letter and spirit. 

Staging walk outs and stalling the functioning of the houses of parliament and state assemblies are but a few ways our netas use to express their respect for the ideals of our constitution. Towards this end our MLAs - particularly those belonging to the northern and eastern states – who frequently hurl shoes, mikes and abuses; as well as damage property, tear up documents and manhandle their adversaries inside state assemblies, are way ahead of their national counterparts.

Bills are frequently passed with little or no debate. Keeping this in mind, the UPA government recently allotted just 36 hours of time for discussion on 30 bills in the ongoing monsoon session of the parliament. Whenever legislation pertaining to granting reservation based on caste or increasing their own perks and privileges are tabled, our leaders cut across party lines and exhibit great camaraderie to pass such laws unanimously. That the likes of Women’s Reservation Bill, which can benefit half of our population in one go, are never passed is quite another matter.

Recent Supreme Court judgement prohibiting criminals from contesting elections and unseating MPs and MLAs on being sentenced to two years or more in prison in a criminal case; or the Central Information Commission’s edict bringing political parties under the ambit of the Right to Information Act 2005, that seek to cleanse our system and restrain the supreme authority of our leaders has not gone down well with them. Predictably, they are resolutely against both these orders and are exhibiting exemplary unity in their endeavour to supersede them with legislation and amendments.

Our netas also show their respect for constitutional institutions from time to time. The Central Bureau of Investigation, for example, is frequently used to settle political scores while the Central Vigilance Commission is deployed for cornering uncompromising bureaucracy.

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), which exposes scam after scam committed by our ministers and their associates, is perhaps the only constitutional establishment which is functioning independently without any political interference.

If our national netas have accomplished so much, our Uttarakhandi ones can do still better. On 15 August this year MLA Ganesh Joshi of the BJP and Mussoorie Municipal Chairman Manmohan Singh Malla of the Congress argued, roughed each other up and almost came to blows on the podium in their bid to unfurl the tricolor to mark the 67th Independence Day in Mussoorie, thereby exhibiting a unique way of respecting our National Flag.

Our netas will, hopefully, not keep us waiting for long to show us how we can respect our National Anthem!

(Published in Garhwal Post on 23/08/2013)