Come elections and for
our netas it is time for desertions, new alliances, name calling, allegations,
counter-allegations, back-stabbing, party hopping and making lofty promises
they have no intention to honour.
It is also the time to give
a go by to the real issues that the country needs to sort out and whip up
frenzies to mislead the common man.
Samajwadi Party supremo
Mulayam Singh Yadav’s “boys will be boys, can’t hang rapists” comment at an
election rally in Moradabad a couple of days ago is proof of the sick mind-set
many of our politicians have and the abysmal depths they can stoop down to when
it comes to garnering votes.
Not only did he make
the highly objectionable remark and express his displeasure and disagreement
with the death sentence awarded by court to three of the accused found guilty
in the Mumbai’s infamous Shakti mill case, but also promised to amend the
country’s anti rape laws to make them more lenient, if his party was voted to
power in the on-going general elections.
Yadav’s statement has
expectedly drawn widespread condemnation. He was clearly attempting to lure
criminals into his party fold, already drawing flak for incompetent governance
and poor law and order situation during its current two year rule in Uttar
Pradesh. People must give his party the treatment it deserves when they go to
their polling booth.
As BJP’s prospects
brighten up and Congress appears set to make an inglorious exit after UPA’s
second tenure known more for financial scams than for governance; India’s
perpetual woes like corruption, unemployment, unsustainable population, high
fiscal deficit, development, lack of infrastructure, poor law and order
situation, poverty, illegal Bangladeshi immigrants etc., which everybody talks
about all the time but nobody has any answers to; have suddenly been abandoned
by all non NDA parties, threat to “secularism” being the new one point agenda
and Narendra Modi the singular target.
At
election rallies, BSP’s Mayawati has been telling people that there will be widespread
riots across the country if Modi comes to power. Rahul Gandhi (Congress) has
been accusing Modi of attempting to promote communalism while Nitish Kumar
(JDU), Laloo Prasad (RJD), Mamta Banerji (TMC), Farooq Abdullah (NC), Ajit
Singh (RLD) and leaders of other UPA parties are calling him anti-Muslim.
Nitish
and Mamta were also seen sharing dais with persons wanted by police for criminal
offences at their election rallies. Congress candidate from Saharanpur in UP Imran Masood
threatened to cut Modi to pieces during
his campaign. Even Arvind Kejriwal (AAP), it seems,
has abandoned his anti-corruption and clean politics stance and is reportedly in
the process of striking a deal with don Mukhtar
Ansari to get Muslim votes for himself in Varanasi.
Despite
the fact that Supreme Court has given him the clean chit, Modi’s political
opponents are telling people that he alone is responsible for the 2002 Gujarat
communal riots. This, in fact, appears to be the only point that the so called “secular”
parties seem to drive home as they keep repeating it over and over again at
their election rallies and meetings in their bid to exhort Muslims to cast
their vote en-bloc against the BJP.
No mention,
though, is made of the worst communal
riots in our history in 1947 on either side of partition, 1984 anti-Sikh, 1969
Ahmedabad, 1983 Assam, 1964 Rourkela & Jamshedpur, 1980 Moradabad, 1989 Bhagalpur, 1993 Mumbai
and countless other riots under Congress rule; Muzaffarnagar 2013 and at least
two dozen more elsewhere in UP during the last two years of Samajwadi Party
rule; or the brutal killing and rape of Kashmiri Pandits and their subsequent
“ethnic cleansing” from their homeland forced by Islamic fundamentalists in
1989 under National Front rule. Incidentally, 1984 riots were also disgracefully
justified with “big tree falls” remark by the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.
No reference is also
made of the fact that post 2012, no communal disturbances have occurred in Gujarat
or how the state has developed under Modi’s rule. Moreover, BJP ruled states
are relatively more peaceful and better administered than those governed by
other parties.
Also omitted is the
fact that the six year NDA rule from 1998 to 2004 under Atal Bihari Vajpayee
was a rare period of internal peace, economic growth and consolidation,
unprecedented infrastructural planning and execution – be it National Highways,
Delhi Metro or new airports; during which the country also successfully
conducted peaceful nuclear test and won the proxy war in Kargil forced upon us
by Pakistan.
It is up to us thus,
the common citizens of this country, to ponder before we cast our votes.
We have to understand
that the self-appointed guardians of “secularism” show their concern only for
Muslims to ensure that they remain their captive vote bank to be cashed at the
polling booth, other minorities totally ignored as they cannot be used thus.
We also have to
understand that most political parties have no inner party democracy and are
run like family owned shops. Brothers, sisters, wives, daughters, sons and relatives
are fielded as candidates; kith and kin mint money by way of contracts, bribes
and kickbacks if they get to participate in the government; while the cheated
voter awaits fulfilment of promises made to him in vain. We have allowed our
netas to fool us for far too long.
We
must likewise remember that the Constitution of India, which guarantees
justice, liberty and equality to all of us irrespective of our caste, creed,
sex or religion, is to be strictly adhered to by the person who takes oath as
the country’s Prime Minister. He does not act alone but collectively as per the
decisions of the Cabinet. Additionally, he is answerable to the Legislature and
Judiciary, besides being under constant media scrutiny.
Amid such situation,
who do we give our mandate to? To those playing the caste and communal cards,
to those in league with criminals, those promising freebies and more quotas,
the corrupt, deceivers, self-seekers, medieval, or the ones with a proven track
record and who can be trusted for deliverance?
The
choice is ours.